TranceBreakers The Toolkit

Relationships · Boundaries

The Go-Between

For the person who ends up in the middle

You are not carrying messages. You are explaining two people to each other. That is a much bigger job than it sounds, and it is the one that costs you.

Why this matters

You did not choose this. You are just good at it.

It starts with love. Almost always.

Two people you care about are having trouble understanding each other. You can see both sides. You always could. So you explain him to her, and her to him, and things settle down a little. Everyone feels better. And because it worked, you do it again.

Nobody appointed you. You just happened to be the one who could hold both versions at once.

I hear the same story constantly. A mother and a spouse. Two siblings. A father and a grown son. Two people at work who stopped speaking directly and now route everything through the one person they both trust. The names change. The shape never does.

If this is you, you are probably not weak and you are almost certainly not a doormat. You are usually the most emotionally fluent person in the room. That is the whole problem. The skill is real, and it is the reason you got the job.

The actual job

You are not passing messages

Let me be precise here, because most people describe this wrong.

If you were only passing messages you would be fine. A message is easy. He said he will be there at six.

What you are actually doing is explaining motive.

She did not mean it that way. He is just tired. She has been like this since her mother died. He is not angry at you, he is angry about work. That is just how she talks.

You are interpreting one person's words, actions and intentions for another person. Every time. That is the job.

And it feels like the kindest thing in the world, because it usually is kind, and it usually helps in the moment.

What it costs

What explaining motive actually does

Here is the part I did not see for years.

To explain somebody, you have to make them smaller.

You cannot hand over the whole person. You hand over a version. A shorter one. One that fits in a sentence and makes sense of the thing that just happened. And a shorter version of a person is much easier to be angry at than the real one.

So in a conversation where you were trying to make peace, you build a small character. Then you hand that character over, and the other person carries it around.

And then you do it in the other direction, because you are fair and you love them both.

Which means you are now running two villains. One in each house.

Nobody intends this. Every one of those conversations feels like generosity while you are having it. That is exactly why it is so hard to catch.

The thing nobody says

You are not neutral

There is something else in the middle seat that people rarely say out loud.

You have an order.

If it ever came down to it, if you were genuinely forced to choose, you already know which way you would go. Most of us do. There is usually a primary relationship and it wins.

You may never say it. You may work very hard not to say it. But it is in the room. Both of them can feel it, and it colors everything you relay whether you want it to or not.

The neutrality is a costume. It fools nobody, including you.

The turn

How it comes back

Then one day it turns around.

The person you were protecting finds out what you said about them. Or the two of them finally talk directly and compare notes. Or somebody gets tired of the arrangement and names it out loud.

And now you are the problem.

You went behind my back. You took her side. You said what about me?

I want to be blunt about this, because it is the trap. You spend years managing everybody's peace, and it comes back at you as disloyalty. Not because anyone is cruel. Because you were the only person holding both versions, which makes you the only one who could have leaked.

From my own years in it

I played a version of this for years in television news. I was an executive producer, and the news director and I ran a good cop, bad cop arrangement. People did not want to go to her, so they came to me. I would smooth it over, or I would advise them how to handle her, and then advise her how to handle them. It worked. I was good at it.

What I could not do was keep her from becoming the villain. That is what the arrangement produced, whether either of us wanted it or not. And it did not serve me. It came back as disloyalty.

It was a dangerous game, and in hindsight I wish I had not gone there. But I did not know then what I know now.

The real cost

The ending nobody sees coming

Here is the part that worries me most, and it is why I am writing this instead of leaving it alone.

People in the middle rarely set a boundary. They go along, and go along, and go along.

And then one day they are done.

They quit the job. They stop calling. They cut somebody off completely, after years of never once raising the problem. And when someone finally asks how long they had felt that way, the honest answer is usually a very long time.

To everyone else it looks like betrayal out of nowhere.

That is the real cost. Not the exhaustion, although you are exhausted. The cost is that the peacekeeper eventually leaves badly, and the people they were protecting never understand why.

Underneath all that going along there is usually anger you never let yourself have. It does not disappear. It waits. It comes out sideways for years, and then it comes out all at once.

One exception worth naming

Sometimes it is deliberate

Sometimes the person handing you messages is doing it deliberately, to control what everybody knows. That is a different problem and it needs different tools. The 4 G's in Apology and Repair are built for it.

Everything else on this page assumes what is usually true. Nobody is being malicious. Everybody loves each other. And it still ends up a mess.

What to do

Five ways out of the middle

You do not have to blow anything up. Most of these happen inside a single conversation.

  1. Hand it back.

    You should tell him that.

    That is the whole move, and it is the one that changes the structure. You are not refusing to care. You are refusing to carry. Say it warmly. Say it every time. You do not owe anyone an explanation for it.

  2. Stop explaining motive.

    This is the discipline underneath all the rest. When someone tells you what the other person did and then looks at you to make sense of it, you do not have to. I do not know why she did that is a complete sentence, and it is usually true. You were guessing anyway.

  3. Say the hard half to the person it belongs to.

    Notice what you would say about someone, and say it to them instead. If you would tell your mother that he gets short when he is overwhelmed, tell him. Not about him. To him.

    Watch the word but while you do it. I love you, but you are difficult cancels the first half completely. I love you, and this is hard for me keeps both. Small change. Entirely different conversation.

  4. Drop the neutral act.

    You do not have to announce your loyalties. You do have to stop pretending you have none. I am not going to be in the middle of this, and you both know where I live is more honest than the performance. People are almost always relieved.

  5. Stay in the room.

    This is the one I would underline. Getting out of the middle is not the same as leaving, and the whole pattern ends in disappearance if you let it run. You can step out of the traffic and stay in the relationship. That is the goal. Not distance. Just direct.

The part that stings

The part where you look at your own hands

One more thing, and this is the one that stings.

If you are in the middle of one triangle, you are almost certainly running another one somewhere else, and in that one you are not the go-between.

The friend you vent to about your sister. The colleague you brief before the meeting so they will be on your side. The parent you call about your spouse.

Here is how it moves, and it moves the same way every time.

First

You step in to fix something. That makes you the rescuer, and it feels good, because rescuing always does.

Then

The other person does not experience you as a helper. They experience you as someone doing something to them. So in their version of it, you are now the one causing the trouble.

Then

When that comes back at you, you feel wronged. You were only trying to help. Now you are the one who got hurt.

Rescuer, then the problem, then the injured party. Play one role and you will play all three.

That is the newsroom, exactly. I stepped in to smooth things over. People ended up experiencing me as part of what was being done to them. And I walked away feeling unappreciated and accused. Three seats, in order, and I did not see a single one of them at the time.

Three small shifts take you out of it.

  • From fixing to curious.
  • From advice to awareness.
  • From control to letting people keep their own power.

I am not naming any of this to make you feel bad. I am naming it because you will only see the middle seat honestly once you have found yourself in the other two. Everybody triangulates. It is what people do when something is hard to say directly.

The rescuer, victim and perpetrator triangle is not mine. Stephen Karpman named it. I first found it laid out well in Jacqueline Small's Becoming Naturally Therapeutic, which is still the version I hand people.

The other seat

If you are the one on the far end

Maybe you are not in the middle. Maybe you are the one being explained.

You hear things secondhand. You get the sense that conversations happen about you. You feel vaguely disliked and you cannot point at why.

You have less to work with here, and I am not going to pretend otherwise. But you have one thing.

You can ask for direct contact, and you can decline to receive reports. If she has a problem with me, I would rather hear it from her. Said once, calmly, to whoever is carrying the message.

You may not get it. Some people will never come to you directly, and that is a real loss. But you can stop being part of a conversation you are not actually in.

The middle seat feels like love, and it usually starts as love. It is the position of the person who cares the most and can see the furthest.

It just cannot hold. Not because you are doing it wrong. Because explaining two people to each other requires making both of them smaller, and neither of them will thank you for it in the end.

You can care about both people without standing between them.

Keep going

Related resources

Everything in the toolkit is free and self guided. Take what is useful.